LIVE

New Jersey’s Assault Weapons Ban Falls: What Changes

Last updated August 2026 · By Nick Hall, covers Second Amendment litigation and state gun law for USA Gun Shop

Quick take: The Third Circuit struck down the New Jersey assault weapons ban and the state’s 10-round magazine limit, sitting en banc and splitting 10-5. It is the first time a federal appeals court has knocked out a state assault weapons ban. The ban has not lapsed yet though: the mandate is now expected on August 10, and the state has asked the court to freeze it while it goes to the Supreme Court.

  • Ruling: New Jersey’s assault firearm ban and its ban on magazines over 10 rounds both violate the Second Amendment.
  • Court: The Third Circuit sitting en banc, 10-5, in Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Platkin, No. 24-2415, decided July 17, 2026.
  • Why it matters: Every other federal circuit to reach the question went the other way, which hands the Supreme Court a clean split.
  • What’s next: The mandate is expected to issue August 10, 2026. Attorney General Jennifer Davenport moved on July 31 to stay it pending a Supreme Court petition, so the ban stays enforceable for now.

Most Second Amendment appeals end one of two ways. Either the panel upholds the law in a paragraph of deference, or it strikes something so narrow that nothing on a shelf actually changes. This one is different, and the difference is a date.

Deals of the Day

Today's best discounts · Updated 3x daily

Gun Deals

See All →
1 / 10

Ammo Deals

See All →
1 / 10
AR-15 rifle shown with several detached 30-round magazines
Table of Contents

What the New Jersey Assault Weapons Ban Ruling Actually Held

On July 17, 2026, the full Third Circuit ruled that New Jersey’s assault firearm statute is unconstitutional as applied to the whole class of semi-automatic rifles it covers, not just one make. Judge Arianna Freeman wrote for the majority. Judge Patty Shwartz wrote the principal dissent.

The court went further than the district court had. A 2024 ruling below had protected only Colt-manufactured AR-15s, a carve-out that satisfied nobody, and the en banc majority expanded that order to reach the full covered class.

It also reversed the part of the lower court’s decision that had upheld the magazine limit. New Jersey capped magazines at 10 rounds in 2018, down from 15, and that cap is now unconstitutional too.

The fight underneath all of it is the Bruen framework, which asks whether a modern gun law fits the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation. Applying that test to a rifle designed in the 1950s and sold by the million has produced wildly different answers depending on which historical analogies a court finds persuasive.

The dissent’s objection cuts at exactly that. Judge Shwartz argued the majority had converted the test into a popularity contest, holding in her framing that states cannot regulate weapons that happen to be commonly owned. That is the “common use” problem, and it is the same fault line the Supreme Court is about to stand on.

The Date Moved, and the Ban Is Still On

A court opinion and a legal shelf are different things, and the gap between them is where most coverage went wrong on this one, including our own first version of this piece. The New Jersey State Police Firearms Dealer Investigation Unit initially notified licensed dealers that the decision was effective July 31, 2026. The Attorney General’s Office then corrected that: July 31 was the deadline to seek rehearing, not the day the ban died.

Update, August 2026: the operative date is the mandate, which the clerk’s office expects to issue on August 10, 2026. Until a mandate issues, the Third Circuit’s judgment is not in force and the 1990 ban and the 10-round magazine limit both remain enforceable.

And on July 31 the state moved to stop the clock entirely. Attorney General Jennifer Davenport asked the Third Circuit to stay its own mandate while New Jersey petitions the Supreme Court, arguing that the six other circuits which upheld comparable bans show a reasonable possibility of reversal. From the filing: “That nearly thirty appellate judges across the ideological spectrum agree with the State’s arguments suggests at least a ‘reasonable possibility’ that five Justices would ultimately do the same.”

The state also told the court that dealers had already sold magazines over the limit on the strength of the ruling, citing at least three instances, and warned that absent a stay “thousands (or more) of such sales could take place in the State, a bell state and local law enforcement could not soon un-ring.”

Here is the part that should settle the question for any New Jersey owner reading this. The Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, which brought the case and won it, is telling New Jersey gun owners not to act on the ruling until the court rules on the stay. When the winning plaintiff tells you to wait, wait.

The Office of the Attorney General has said it is developing practical guidance for residents and businesses. That guidance had not landed as of this writing, which leaves dealers holding the operational questions about how transfers get processed once the date passes.

Not everything in the case is resolved. Challenges touching certain semi-automatic pistols and shotguns went back to the district court for further proceedings, so the ruling is broad on rifles and magazines and unfinished elsewhere.

The State Is Not Conceding

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport called the decision “as unfortunate as it is legally incorrect,” and pointed at the rest of the country to make the argument. “Every other federal circuit court to consider the issue has come out the other way,” she said.

She is right about that, and it is exactly why the ruling carries weight. New Jersey has said it is considering its options, which in practice means a stay application, a cert petition, or both.

But a stay is a harder ask after an en banc court has already spoken. A three-judge panel getting reversed by the full circuit is routine. The full circuit getting paused by the Supreme Court on an emergency application, in a case the Court has effectively already agreed to decide on the merits elsewhere, is a different proposition.

Eight Days Earlier, the Seventh Circuit Went the Other Way

The timing here is almost comic. On July 9, 2026, the Seventh Circuit upheld Illinois’ ban on the same class of rifles and magazines in Barnett v. Raoul, which we covered when the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court. Eight days later the Third Circuit reached the opposite conclusion on materially the same question.

That is what a circuit split looks like, and the Supreme Court is already holding the tools to fix it. The justices granted review in Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins and consolidated them, teeing up whether the Second Amendment protects AR-platform rifles and similar semi-automatic firearms.

Whatever the Court says will override both rulings. Until it speaks, the law depends on which side of the Delaware River you are standing on.

What a New Jersey Buyer Should Actually Expect

Read the ruling as a change to what the state may prohibit, not as a change to everything else that governs a purchase. New Jersey’s permitting structure, its Firearms Purchaser Identification Card, background checks, and one-gun-a-month provisions are separate machinery and were not at issue here, which is the detail most likely to trip up somebody walking into a shop on August 1 expecting a different experience.

Expect inventory to lag the calendar too. Dealers who have not stocked a banned-class rifle since the statute passed do not refill a shelf overnight, and the compliance guidance is still pending. Our New Jersey gun laws guide tracks the rest of the framework, and the shops we rate in the state are where the guidance will show up first.

One appeals court has now said out loud that a state cannot ban the most popular rifle in America. Four days from now, New Jersey has to act like it.


Frequently Asked Questions

Not yet. The Third Circuit held the state's assault firearm ban unconstitutional as applied to the covered class of semi-automatic rifles, but that judgment only bites when the court issues its mandate, currently expected August 10, 2026. On July 31 the Attorney General asked the court to stay that mandate while New Jersey petitions the Supreme Court. Until it is resolved the 1990 ban is still enforceable, and the plaintiffs who won the case are advising New Jersey gun owners not to act on the ruling yet.

What case struck down New Jersey's assault weapons ban?

Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Platkin, No. 24-2415, decided by the Third Circuit sitting en banc on July 17, 2026. The vote was 10-5, with Judge Arianna Freeman writing for the majority.

The same ruling held the state's 10-round magazine limit unconstitutional. New Jersey set that cap in 2018, reducing it from 15 rounds. It is on the same timetable as the rifle ban, which means it stays in force until the mandate issues and any stay is resolved. The state has told the court that some dealers already sold over-capacity magazines on the strength of the ruling.

Do I still need a Firearms Purchaser Identification Card?

Yes. The ruling addressed which firearms the state may prohibit. New Jersey's permitting structure, the Firearms Purchaser Identification Card, background checks and other purchase requirements were not struck down and still apply.

Does this ruling apply outside New Jersey?

The Third Circuit covers New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the Virgin Islands. It does not change law in other circuits, and every other federal appeals court to reach the question has ruled the other way.

Will the Supreme Court settle this?

The justices have granted review in Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins and consolidated them. Those cases ask whether the Second Amendment protects AR-platform rifles and similar semi-automatic firearms, and the answer will override both the Third and Seventh Circuit rulings.

What did the Seventh Circuit decide?

On July 9, 2026, eight days before the New Jersey ruling, the Seventh Circuit upheld Illinois' ban on comparable rifles and magazines in Barnett v. Raoul. The two decisions conflict, which is what created the circuit split.

What is still unresolved in the case?

Claims involving certain semi-automatic pistols and shotguns were sent back to the district court for further proceedings. The ruling is broad on rifles and magazines and unfinished on other categories.


6,036+ Gun & Ammo Deals

Updated daily from 200+ top retailers. Filter by category, caliber, action type, and price.

More Gun News

See all news →

CZ Brings the TS 3 Orange to the US at $3,549

Sep 5

Rost Martin’s RM1X Puts a Compact Slide on a Full-Size Grip

Sep 5

Remington Adds .45 Colt to the Core-Lokt Handgun Line

Sep 5

Hornady’s New Safe Lock Reads the Veins in Your Palm

Sep 5

Leave a Comment